State v. AM,
The client was charged with DUI in a case with very unfavorable facts. We discovered a procedural error on the part of the prosecution and got the case dismissed.
State v. MM:
Client charged with DUI and admitted to officers that he was “buzzed”. We were able to get the client’s statements suppressed and get the state to agree to dismiss the DUI charge.
State v. LL:
Our Client charged which DUI with a BAC of .168. The prosecution would not agree to a fair plea bargain. Our Client was found not guilty at trial due to our ability to challenge the validity of the government’s impairment evidence.
State v. DN:
Our minor client charged with DUI involving an accident. After filing motions attacking the state’s evidence, we were able to convince the government to dismiss the DUI charge and agree to a plea to a minor offense.
State v. JB:
Client was an ROTC cadet and would lose his future career if convicted of DUI. After filing motions to suppress the State’s evidence, we were able to negotiate the charges to a non-alcohol related traffic offense.
State v. JH:
Our client charged with a 2nd DUI. Our thorough knowledge of the rules of evidence enabled us to convince the State to dismiss the DUI charge and allow client to plead to a non-alcohol related traffic offense.
People v. AM
Client was charged with DUI. We challenged the constitutionality of the stop. We asked for extensive relevant documentation. The Government did not turn over everything that we asked for. As a sanction for the government’s failure to properly prepare their case, the Judge dismissed all charges against out client.
People v. RD
The client was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. The client was adamant that he was not substantially impaired. Prosecution would not fairly negotiate the case. We went to a jury trial where the jury found the client not guilty on all charges.
People v. G
The client was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. The client was adamant that he was not impaired. At the 11th hour we convinced prosecutors to offer a plea to a non-alcohol related traffic offense.
People v. AK.
The client was on probation for a DUI case and the government was seeking to revoke her probation, which can carry possible jail time. We convinced the government to drop all charges.
People v. TB.
The client was charged with DUI in an accident case. After the government refused to fairly negotiate the case, we took the case to a jury trial. The jury acquitted our client of DUI.
People v. JC.
The client was charged with DUI. We challenged the reason for the stop as unconstitutional. The judge agreed and dismissed the case in its entirety.
People v. LL.
The client was charged with DUI. We convinced the government to drop all DUI charges.
People v. MA.
The police charged our client with DUI. We convinced the government that our client’s poor performance on the roadside gymnastic maneuvers was due to prior injuries to his legs. His bad performance on the breath test was due to a malfunction in the intoxilyzer 5000 EN. The government dismissed the DUI and agreed to a minor traffic infraction.
People v. TE.
The client was charged with DUI and had a high BAC. We convinced the government that the breath test had to be wrong because client’s performance on roadsides clearly indicated that he was not impaired. The government entered into an agreement whereby as long as the client met some conditions his case would be dismissed.
People v. Unnamed client
The client was on her 7th DUI. The Government wanted a lengthy jail sentence. We convinced the government that our client had a serious alcohol problem which was a combination of genetic and learned behavior. The Government agreed to no jail time and we got our client into intensive alcohol therapy.
KC v. Unnamed Business-
Our client was walking into a building when she slipped and fell on an uneven drainage grate. Our client needed a total hip replacement. After hard fought negotiations, and on the eve of trial, we secured a $100,000+ settlement for our client.
MR v. Unnamed Business-
Our client slipped and fell in a supermarket. The supermarket had a water leak which caused her to fall and tear ligaments in her knee. We secured a settlement which paid for all of our client’s medical care and additionally got her a reasonable sum of money for pain and suffering.
In the matter of WJ.
The client fell on ice and broke a bone. The area in which he fell was supposed to be maintained by the owner of the property. The owner refused to take accountability. The court allowed us to maintain a claim for punitive damages because the defendant’s conduct was reprehensible. The case recently settled for $70,000 which will pay our client’s medical bills and leave him with a reasonable amount for pain and suffering.
Olson v. Unnamed Insurance Company
The client fell on ice and snow in the parking lot of a business and broke her arm. The business was supposed to be putting sand and salt on the area to prevent any injuries. The case settled for $90,000 and the client was well compensated for her injuries, pain and suffering.
People v. M
The client got food poisoning from eating at a local restaurant. We convinced the restaurant’s insurance company to pay for all of the client’s medical bills, lost wages, and a reasonable award for pain and suffering.
People v. CJ.
The client was bit by an aggressive dog while riding in an acquaintance’s vehicle. We convinced the acquaintance’s insurance company that the incident arose out of the use of an automobile. Subsequently, the insurance company paid all the medical bills and a reasonable amount for pain and suffering.
Brad v. Unnamed Bagel Company
The client bit into a bagel which had a foreign object within it cracking our client’s tooth. We obtained a favorable settlement with compensated the client for all of his dental work, plus a reasonable amount for pain and suffering.
Zapien v. BBQ manufacturer
The client suffered bad burns on his leg when his BBQ became a blow torch and shot flames at his body. We hired the best experts who discovered a defect in the BBQ. The manufacturer refused to compensate our client fairly because they knew that the manufacturer’s headquarters were in China and they gambled that we would not fly to China to depose their corporate executives. They were wrong. We flew to China; got everything we needed, and favorably settled the case within 30 days of returning to America.
In the matter of FE.
The client was in an auto accident. After intensive negotiations with the other driver’s insurance company a settlement was reached in excess of $150,000.
In the matter of CD.
The client was in an auto accident. After intensive negotiations with the other driver’s insurance company a settlement was reached for $175,000.
In the matter of EM
The client lost her young daughter in a heart wrenching automobile accident. Many people in the client’s car were injured. We negotiated a $400,000 settlement with the other driver’s insurance company.
JD v. Unnamed Insurance
Company- Our client was the passenger in a car accident. The driver hit a tree and his passenger was injured. We received a settlement from the insurance company which allowed client to obtain medical care and recover for lost wages.
CW v. Unnamed Insurance Company
The client was insured in an auto accident and we obtained a settlement of over $90,000 to compensate her for her injuries.
PS v. Unnamed Insurance Company
The client was injured in an auto accident and obtained a settlement for $100,000 for his injuries.
DR. v Unnamed Insurance Company
The client was in her car when another driver failed to yield the right of way, ultimately crashing into our client’s car. The client suffered numerous broken bones in her foot. We obtained a full policy limits settlement.
TP v. Unnamed Organization-
Our client was subject to repeated gender harassment by her employer. We secured a $100,000+ settlement for our client.
People v. H
The client was charged with assaulting a police officer and other serious charges. The charges carried a mandatory prison sentence. We did an extensive investigation including hiring private detectives who interviewed everyone near the scene. Witness testimony and our discovery of video evidence led to all charges being dropped against our client. The police officers who made the report against our client are now being investigated by internal affairs.
People v. EJ
Client was charged with theft. We used the language of the statute to prove that client had no intent to “permanently deprive the owner of the property.” The case was dismissed.
Our client was charged with “public fighting” and assault. We convinced the prosector that our client was acting in self-defense. The government dropped all charges.
Rogue state drug cops confiscated almost 10 pounds of our client’s medical cannabis. We convinced the cops and their bosses that they unlawfully confiscated medicine in accordance with Colorado’s constitution. All medicine was returned.
The criminal defense attorneys at The Law Firm of Jeremy Rosenthal, in Denver, Colorado, have extensive experience successfully negotiating for dropped or reduced charges and defending clients in courtroom across the state.
The outcome of each case is dependent on the facts of that case and the applicable law, as interpreted by the court. A criminal defense lawyer can never honestly promise you a specific result. However, you can see from the success stories below that we fight aggressively to protect our clients’ rights.
Contact our Denver law office to get a skilled trial attorney working on your criminal case.
We fight hard for our clients to achieve the best possible outcome in their case. For a free consultation with a defense lawyer at The Law Firm of Jeremy Rosenthal, call 303-825-2223 or contact the firm online.
Convenient appointment scheduling · Credit cards accepted